Atmospheric water generation system

The atmospheric water generation device is engineered to extract water in regions characterized by low humidity and high temperatures. This system achieves water condensation by cooling the air and utilizing MOF sorbents. The setup is capable of producing up to 50 liters of water per day.

Industry:

Green tech

TRL:

1 → 7

Project duration:

4 months

Atmospheric water generation system

Challenge

During the development of the atmospheric water generator, we encountered several challenges:

  1. Transport Restrictions: Air transport of devices filled with refrigerant is prohibited due to the risks associated with leakage and flammability. Consequently, we needed to devise a solution that would allow the end user to charge the system with refrigerant independently upon receipt.
  2. Airflow Management: The initial design, where the entire airflow passed through radiators and was solely regulated by fan speed, did not yield the desired results. Increasing the fan speed led to overheating of the cold radiator, which reduced water condensation efficiency. Conversely, decreasing the fan speed caused the hot radiator to overheat to temperatures between 90-100 degrees Celsius, impairing its cooling efficiency.
  3. Environmental Impact: The high ambient temperature and direct sunlight, combined with the compact dimensions of the device (480×540×970 mm), significantly reduced system efficiency. This was due to the diminished temperature gradient between the condenser and the evaporator.

Our Role

  • Concept solutions
  • 3D CAD Design and Modeling
  • FEA Simulations
  • Electronics design
  • Firmware
  • Design for manufacturing
  • Prototyping

Technologies Used

FreeRTOS
WiFi
ESP32
CFD
Test benches
MQTT

EnCata offers comprehensive hardware and IoT product development services at a fraction of the cost

For Enterprises

R&D + design + manufacturing under ONE roof
Scale up and down your team
Intergrated hardware + software development
New technologies and research 

CORPORATIONS click HERE for more info

For Startups

MVP and POC prototypes
Affordable consultancy rates
All IP is yours
In-house batch production

STARTUPS click HERE for more info

Approach & Solution

The development of the system for the Customer commenced with an analysis of existing market solutions to identify competitive features for the new product. Our team conducted technical benchmarking, determined key design parameters, risks, development stages, and acceptance criteria. After outlining the work plan and organizing the team, we began designing the layout and electronic schematic for the system. Electronic components and modules were selected, library components were developed, the printed circuit board (PCB) was assembled, and the file for its production was prepared. Subsequently, prototypes were built, and a cloud service was set up for data extraction regarding the system's status. Our mechanical engineers developed the 1.0 concept, prepared a 3D model, conducted fluid and air flow simulations, identified the optimal cooling substance, and prepared the engineering documentation for the first prototype's manufacture.

Initially, we decided to use an off-the-shelf refrigeration solution to expedite development. However, it had a critical flaw for this situation—the lack of a refrigerant charging capability, which posed a significant problem for air transport. Our goal was to enable the Customer to charge the system independently, and the optimal and only solution was to add a charging port to the standard system. Our engineers performed a detailed analysis of existing refrigeration systems to understand the risks of such modifications, studied the requirements for charging ports to determine the appropriate type, selected a charging port that met safety standards and was easy to use, and ensured compatibility with refrigerant R290. The choice of R290 was justified by its non-toxicity and low compressor outlet temperature (ozone depletion potential ODP = 0, global warming potential GWP = 3). Our team also prepared detailed instructions for the Client on how to charge the system with refrigerant independently.

The operation of the device was initially managed solely through adjusting the fan speed, which complicated achieving an optimal balance of temperature and humidity.

In the first iteration of the system, our team encountered difficulties in regulating the airflow through the desiccant. We increased the airflow through the desiccant to prevent the condenser from overheating, as greater airflow was expected to enhance heat exchange and avoid overheating. However, when the airflow increased, the air did not have sufficient time to cool completely as it passed through the cold radiator. This resulted in moisture failing to condense fully and escaping with the airflow, thereby reducing the system's efficiency.

Conversely, when we decreased the airflow, the air had enough time to cool and moisture condensed effectively. Yet, in this mode, the evaporator overheated because insufficient air passed through it for cooling. This caused the evaporator temperature to rise to critical levels, diminishing the overall performance of the system.

To address this issue, a new design incorporating an adjustable bypass valve was developed, allowing for more precise control of airflow and system temperature. In the new system iteration, we designed a dual-channel airflow system: a main path and a bypass path. The main path directed air through both radiators (hot and cold), ensuring maximum water condensation. The bypass path allowed some air to circumvent the cold radiator, preventing its overheating. This solution involved installing an electrically controlled adjustable damper, enabling the modification of the air volume passing through each radiator. This configuration allowed for precise temperature regulation and efficient system operation under various conditions.

The system is designed to operate in direct sunlight, which adversely affects its efficiency. One part of the system contains a refrigerator where cooling occurs, while another part houses a heat exchanger that must dissipate heat to the environment. In hot outdoor conditions, the temperature gradient between the heat exchanger and the air is reduced, making this setup inefficient.

To partially address this issue, we proposed four configurations of insulation materials (steel, sheet plastic, and foam polyethylene) to insulate the walls of the installation. Given the system's operating principles and the components it uses, we could not leave the foam polyethylene unprotected as it would accumulate moisture. Therefore, we proposed covering this material on both sides with different layers.

1) The external layer was a 1 mm thick white metal panel, followed by a 19 mm insulation layer, and then another 1 mm metal layer.

2) The external layer was an 8 mm thick white metal panel, followed by a 20 mm air cushion, a 3 mm high-density polyethylene (HDPE) layer, a 5 mm insulation layer, and a 1 mm stainless steel layer.

3) The external layer was a 3 mm black HDPE layer, followed by a 5 mm insulation layer, and a 1 mm stainless steel panel.

4) The external layer was a 3 mm white HDPE layer, followed by a 5 mm insulation layer, and a 1 mm stainless steel layer.

Simulation results indicated that the best external material for the insulation sandwich was steel painted white (with a heating temperature of no more than 49°C at an external temperature of 45°C), while the best results for foam polyethylene were achieved with a 19 mm thickness as in the first configuration.

We combined elements from the first and fourth configurations and integrated this solution into the prototype.

We developed a more complex and adaptive airflow management system to ensure the efficient operation of the installation under various temperature conditions. By adding a bypass path and enabling damper control, we prevented the cold radiator from overheating and achieved a condensation rate of 10 liters per day under standard conditions, without using MOF sorbents. By regulating the direction of the airflows and mixing them, we could utilize standard off-the-shelf components for operation in harsh conditions.

Results and Benefits

We delivered two TRL-7 prototypes to the Customer for testing: one with MOF-coated plates and one without. Throughout the project, the Customer received weekly reports on our research and development results. All associated design documentation, including editable drawings and 3D models, Gerber files, BOM, and pick-and-place files, was also provided to the Customer.

1.55 kW

The energy consumption of the system per liter of water

4 months

Instead of 6 - it took for us to develop and manufacture the TRL-7 prototypes

50 kg

The weight of the system

left-arrowBack to All Projects

Have a project to do?

Fill out the form and a member from our sales team will get back to you

Thank you!
Your request has been submitted! We shall contact you shortly

Oops! Something went wrong... Try to reload this page and resubmit

FAQ

At EnCata, what kinds of contracts do you use? Is it a fixed-term or an agile contract?
Can you provide me with a certification of competence?
What level of training do your specialists have?
Is it possible for us to cooperate with EnCata’s team?
Is it possible to discuss the project with your technical team?
Can EnCata facilitate mass production?
Do you sign NDAs?
Patent or Develop first?
Does EnCata outsource electronics services?
Do you write program code, either software or firmware?
Are there hardware engineers in your team?
What should I do now that I've approached you with my project idea?
Can EnCata help me with fundraising?